Counseling Psychology

A replete(predicate) understanding of invitees problems within the province of psychological counselling removes non nevertheless the cogency of the theoretical account employed except also how it applies in practice. Mindful of the item that there is no single interpolation or explanation that atomic number 50 by chance apply to all baptisterys there is a pressing need for focus psychologists to constitute into consideration the clients rank of raft that is, how the client understands, appropriates and integrates for his/herself his/her current situation.If we argon to characterize the past two decades, we whitethorn say that it is noted for an increased tension on methodological diversity, not lonesome(prenominal) in surfacees but also, and more seriously, in monetary value of alternative research methods in commission psychology (Gold homosexual, 1976 Howard, 1983). In this aspect, the egression of pragmatism allowed for diverse antennaes in direction ps ychology which values both clinical and subjective tell apartledge (Hanson, 2005, p.226). Mindful of this monumental shift in theorizing and research, this paper seeks to announce the underpinnings of the generalist border on to counseling psychology, their problems and limitations so as to provide feasible solutions for a more pragmatic approach that is good enough not only for the clients but for the practician as well. The dominant approach in the profession of counseling psychology is the generalist object lesson of intervention.The generalist approach is basically a problem-solving approach which operates on the assertion that as experts, psychologists know best, since they have the obligatory knowledge, skills and training in handling clients problems. sextet interrelated steps/stages be complex in the generalist intervention model (1) assessment, (2) planning, (3) intervention, (4) evaluation, (5) termination, and (6) follow up.The essential difference amid the generalist and the person-centered approach in terms of intervention is that the generalist sees the relationship in the expert-client kind of way, whereas, it is not necessarily the case for the person-centered approach. The counseling psychologist who employs the person-centered approach knows the value of emphatic listening and applies it to his/her clients for this leave be of large care in addressing the clients need for verifying regard from others.If the client feels comfortable with the counseling psychologist because the latter knows how to listen, therefore this will be of great help in boosting the clients self-worth. The person-centered approach was developed from the client-centered approach by Carl Rogers. Regarding the bear on of the person-centered approach, Krebs and Blackman (1988) wrote The person-centered approach has had impact on domains extraneous of therapy such as family life, education, leadership, conflict resolution, politics and community healt h. On a precedent note, it may be said that for Krebs and Blackman, the person-centered approach has many interesting and fruitful applications. As was noted earlier, Rogers person-centered therapy is a passing of his client-centered therapy, the foundation of which is a phenomenological and existential framework on construing a theory of personality. An equal theory of personality, as Roger sees it, must bundle into account the core notions of (1) mankind disposition and (2) the valet condition and the reason for up the aforementioned condition.He writes the core of mans nature is essentially positive (1961, p. 73). He adopts an organismic view of the person in a positive way. It is positive in the sense that the person, as an organism, is driven by an actualizing t destructionency. This idea is actuallly not something new and may be compared to the ancient Greeks idea of the telos which is the Greek term for end or purpose. In Aristotles view, for instance, mans telos invo lves the actualization of the distinctive human function.It is, in this direction accordingly that human beings ought to move that is, the actualization of the human potentials. The good life is a dish up not a state of being. It is a direction, not a destination (Rogers, 1961, p. 186). The Self then for Rogers, is driven by the said actualizing tendency. A fully-functioning person for Rogers is a person who is maturation, or if I may use Aristotles word flourishing. The fully-functioning person flourishes, so to speak, that is, geared towards development. Development in this sense, would involve personality development.Since mans nature, as Rogers claims, is positive then he/she will seek personality development. If the person-centered approach to counseling psychology is more appropriate in terms of producing successful outcomes, then perhaps we may consider juxtaposing such an approach with the constructivist framework. According to Neimeyer (1995) constructivism represents a meta-theory and epistemologic stance that emphasises self-conceiving, self-organising, and proactive features of human knowing (cited in Savickas, 2000, p. 60).Moreover, by juxtaposing the person-centered approach with constructivism, both the client and the counseling psychologist may continuously review, revise and re-orient themselves with the things that they know and how they live their lives. This is to say that there is no monopoly in terms of the learning process that opts place since both the client and the counseling psychologist takes an active part in the meaning-making process. This way, psychology becomes humanistic. Rogers person-centered approach is of this type.Humanistic psychology, as a answer to positivistic psychology, sheds light on important questions that matter, not only for the client and practitioner, student and teacher. Schneider, et. al, summarized these questions as follows What does it mean to be fully experientially human? and How does that und erstanding illuminate the finish or vital life? (Schneider, et. al, 2001, p. xx). These questions are questions of universal concern and have been frame in different ways by different thinkers in different periods in the history of ideas.In the final analysis, we may take refuge in the thought that developing humanistic psychology brings us close together(predicate) to understanding our human condition, our situatedness. In so doing, it also gives us a fuller understanding of our very own humanity. For it is by knowing who we are and where we stand can we chart the rightful path towards a just and humane society. References Goldman, L. (1976). A novelty in counsellor psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 23 543-552. Hanson, W. E. (2005). Mixed Methods Research Designs in Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 52 224-235. Howard, G. S. (1983).Toward Methodological Pluralism. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 30 19-21. Krebs, D. , Blackman, R. (1988) . Psychology A starting time Encounter. Toronto Harcourt suspender Jovanovich. Rogers, C. R. (1965). A Humanistic Conception of public. In R. E. Farson (ed. ) Science and Human personal business Science and Behavior Books, Inc. ___. (1961). On decorous a Person. Houghton Mifflin. Savickas, M. L. (2000). Renovating the Psychology of Careers for the Twenty First Century. The Future of Career. Cambridge University Press. Schneider, K. J. , et. al. (2001). The Handbook of Humanistic Psychology Leading Edges in Theory, Research and Practice. Sage.