Generative Grammar

FOUNDATIONS IN GENERATIVE GRAMMARAny native speaker of a style can be said to know the grammar of his/her own terminology, they know how to form and interpret any expression. However, this well-formed fellowship is subconscious. native-born speaker have grammatical competency in their native language. This means that they have soundless knowledge of the grammar of their own lang. We have to make a difference between competence (the fluent native speakers tacit knowledge of his lang) and performance (what good deal actually say and understand, the use of the language). Criteria of adequacyBasically, the criteria of adequacy ar 2 descriptive adequacy (universality) and explanatory adequacy. 1. A grammar is descriptively qualified if it correctly describes whether a sequence of words is or isnt grammatical and also correctly describes what interpretation(s) this sequence has. 1. 1. The goal of a descriptive linguist is to devise busy grammars of spellicular languages, while th at of a theoretical linguist is to devise a speculation of grammar. This is a caste of hypotheses about the nature of possible and impossible grammars of native languages and about the inherent properties that natural langs do and dont possess.An adequate surmise of grammar must satisfy the criterion of adequacy known as universality. This means that a theory of grammar must enable us to devise a descriptively adequate grammar for every natural lang. The of import goal of Generative Grammar is to build a theory of Universal Grammar. 2. This theory of UG entrust not notwithstanding list the universal properties of natural lang grammars, but also explain the relevant properties i. e. why grammar have the properties they do. This extremity is referred to as explanatory adequacy. Language FacultyAccording to Chomsky, the most plausible explanation for uniformity and rapidity lies in that the hunt of acquisition is primed(p) by a biologically endowed innate language energy ins ide the brain, which provides children with a genetically transmitted set of procedures for developing a grammar on the basis of their linguistic beget (the lyric input they receive). The hypothesis that the course of lang acquisition is determined by an innate language faculty is known as the innateness hypothesis. The major tenets of this hypothesis are 1. The innate language faculty is unique to humans. . wholly humans possess this ability of lang acquisition. 3. The uniformity character suggests that children have a genetic guidance in the assess of building a grammar of their native lang. 4. Despite performance errors in the input, children acquire a competence grammar, which again points to the fact that the acquisition ability must be genetically determined. 5. Although no special vexation is taken to teach them, children acquire languages successfully, which again supports the genetic character of lang acquisition. Principles We have claimed that children have a genetic ally endowed language faculty.If so, what are the defining properties of the language faculty? The lang faculty must include a set of principles of Universal Grammar, in the sense that the lang faculty must be such as to get the child to develop a grammar of any natural lang on the basis of a sufficient speech input. If these principles are universal their application in one language should reveal evidence of their application in other langs. The underlying rule to construct a particular bodily structure in one language will be part of a general principle of UG. (1) a. Mary will tell me the truth. b. bequeath Mary tell me the truth? Move the second word in a sentence in front of the first word) (2) a. The girl in the corner will tell me the truth. b. *Girl the in the corner.? STRUCTURE DEPENDENCE PRINCIPLE All grammatical operations are structure-dependent. To explain grammaticality and ungrammaticality we should rely on general principles such as the Structure Dependence Pr inciple, although in each language this principle will be turned into something more concreteMove an auxiliary in front of a front noun expression which functions as its subject. This rule makes use of structural information which is subconsciously available to all humans, although people dont know what an auxiliary is. Also this rule accounts for the contrast in (3) (3) a. Mary told me the truth. b. *Told Mary the truth? as we have applied inversion to a non-auxiliary. A theory of grammar which posits that the internal structure of words, phrases and clauses in natural lang is determined by innate UG principles minimizes the burden of grammatical learning imposed on the child.This is quite of import given the learnability criterion of adequacy for any theory of grammar. The UG theory accounts for the rapidity of the childs grammatical development by positing that there is a universal set of innately endowed grammatical principles which determine the nature of grammatical structur e and the range of grammatical operations found in natural lang. Since these UG principles dont have to be learned, the UG theory minimizes the learning load placed on the child and as a consequence maximizes the learnability of natural language grammars. ParametersAlthough the lang faculty involves a set of UG principles, all aspects of the grammatical structure of language are not determined by innate gramm. principles. Otherwise all languages would have the same structure and there would not be any structural learning in lang acquisition. So although there are universal principles which control the boilersuit structure of a lang, there are also language-particular aspects of grammatical struct which children have to learn as part of acquiring their native lang. Acquisition involves structural learning, which is limited to a set of parameters.Parameters are those aspects of grammatical structure which are subject to lang-particular variation. Examples of parameters 1. Null subject parameter languages which permit omission of the subject of a mortal verb and langs that do not. (4) a. Maria come pasta. b. Come pasta. (5) a. Mary eats pasta. b. *Eats pasta. 2. Wh-parameter languages which permit fronting of the wh-phrase or not. (6) a What do you think he will say? b. ?Que piensas que el dira? c. Ni xiangxin ta hui shuo shenme you think he will say whatEnglish and Spanish Wh-phrases move to the beginning of the interrogative clause, but Chinese Wh-phrase remains in situ. 3. Head position parameter the relative positioning of heads with respect to their complements. Head-first languages and Head-last langs. (7) a. Close the door b. Moonul dadala. door cheeseparing (8) a. desire for change. b. byunhwa-eadaehan kalmang change-for desire 4. Discourse/Agreement Prominence Miyagawa (2005) claims that languages can be classified according to whether they are focus or engagement prominent.On the basis of his classification, there are languages which overtly instanti ate the notion of root (Korean or Japanese), there are also languages which put a special emphasis on agreement marking (English), but additionally there are languages which show both (Spanish). Jimenez (2008, 2009) 9) a. Taroo-ga hon-o katta. Taro-NOM defy-ACC bought Taro bought a book. b. Hon-o Taroo-ga katta. Book-ACC Taro-NOM bought A book, Taro bought. 10) a. Mary likes syntax. b. *Syntax Mary likes. (11) a.Susana corto los tulipanes. (S-V-O) Susana cutpast3sg the tulips Susana cut the tulips. b. Los tulipanes(,) los corto Susana. (O-cl-V-S) The tulips, CL3pl,masc cut Susana The tulips, Susana cut. Parameter-setting Parameters involve binary choices, so structural variation between langs is constrained. The only structural learning that children have to face is the task of setting the appropriate value for each of the relevant structural parameters Metaphor of the switch in the up or down position.