12 Angry Men

12 angry MenGrand canyon University Introduction: In the movie 12 Angry Men an eighteen year old male child is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurymans deliberate that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, pull for one, who commits that they owe the boy more(prenominal) than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not. The objet dart who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the proportionality of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An old man afterward sees where he is sack with his reasoning and when the next voting is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors get over to discuss the case and plant up some burning(prenominal) facts in favor of the teenager. Gradually, different jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not become outraged. This motif germinate out analyze this movie in basis of how this group worked in design and the end making touch on, which emerged by answering nine clean out questions. What is the influence of pertinent background factors on severally jurors decision making process?

juror 1 was a school and knew the true meaning of functional together and in an dandy fashion. Juror 2 was a flocculent verbalize follower who could be swayed by the crowd. Juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear kinship with his own son. The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him view the womans testimony of perceive the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who give eyeglasses do not wear them to bed. Juror 5 was minor mannered and kept his cool and was opened to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper