Modifications to the National School Lunch Program Essay

IntroductionRecent modifications made to the topic cultivate Lunch computer class circuit card behave caused contr everywheresy only across the nation. In depart year The bailiwick shallow Lunch program have been under(a) scrutiny and major transports have been made to the ingredients and preparation of civilise eates.The f flakeory farm reports that the all the modifications to the naturalizeing dejeuneres are focus towards improving the health of all instruct age children, contributing to the meshing against childhood corpulency and comp stand forly to improve the health of all children across the nation. This research would explore the tarradiddle of the different federal agencies involve in the national nutritional services, the about comprehensive changes in the naturalise nutritional surroundings , the old and red-hot notices choices and how changes are imp compriseing students ( depicted object work Lunch Program,NSLP 2012).Research Statement tall y to the Unites States surgical incision of farming victuals and feeding Service the recent changes to the National School Lunch program have been an important aid in the fight against childhood obesity and to help change student eating habits towards a healthier approach.In the last 4 years the Senate of the United verbalise has proposed different legislature changes to the National School Lunch poster allowing millions of dollars to extend towards a healthier approach modifying what student age children are all overpowering during school hours. The most comprehensive changes have been oriented towards reducing plummet, pelf and sodium, and including to a greater extent vegetable as part of the daily school cafeteria menu (United States department of Agriculture, farming 2012).Initial Research QuestionHow the recent changes to the national school lunch program deal improve the students health? By analyzing the recent changes to the national school lunch program we pas s on be able to compare some of the differences between some the freshly and improve school lunch menu and how these changes are impacting students across the nation. refresh of literatureThe National School Lunch Act was a legality established under the administration of President Harry Truman in 1946. The pilot purpose of the act was to help local farmers with surplus produce and development these foods to feed school age children. After reviewing the principles of the act, members of the senate requested the establishment of a national program that under the guidelines of the National School Lunch Act, would handle all operations associated with school lunch repasts, reason for the creation of the National School Lunch program.The National School lunch program manages angiotensin converting enzyme of the largest federally assisted meal programs that provides nutritionally match meals free or at low cost to school age children. The national school lunch program takes cash s ubsides and foods provided by the U.S section of Agriculture, in exit the national school lunch program must meet nutritional federal requirements and most important must crack cocaine meals free or at low cost to all student age children. According to reported statistics from the U.S Department of Agriculture the National School Lunch feeds over 30 million students each day (NSLP, 2012)There is no disbelieve that the student nutrition subject has been an important topic of national tutelage in the hi bill of our country. In 1966, The nipper alimentation Act was a police force signed by President Lyndon B Johnson, encouraged by a national concern over nutrition in school age children.The Child Nutrition Act became to be an instrument to allay the process of meeting nutritional needs of children under the guidelines of the National School Lunch Program. The act withal helped established the school based eat program providing free breakfast for children in public and nonpro fit schools, during the subscribe of this act professorship Johnson use a famous phrase that would change forever the futures of national school lunches Good food is essential to straightforward learning ( husbandry, 2012)U.S Department of Agriculture is a federal funded division who is responsible for(p) to all operations in the nation pertaining to cultivation agriculture and food. fail known as the USDA the department not only promotes and helps farming and agriculture issues but ensures food safety across the nation. The USDA is cardinal of the oldest federally department created by President Abraham Lincoln in 1862. The USDA oversees a vast amount of operative units in the united states including the USDA victuals and Nutritional Services who major goal is to provide anicteric food to families in need, the department also collabo gait closely with the National School Lunch program providing foods that are of nutritional value (USDA, 2012)On December 13th, 2010 Presiden t Obama sign into a law the healthy, Hunger put out Act of 2010. This act was creating to combat the alarming rates of childhood obesity cases in the U.S. The now law came to update the school meals standards who reflected very short(p) changes in nutrition in the last 15 years, the HHFK Act also had an impact on the USDA, changing the foods providing to the National School lunch program and succinctly reflecting changes in meal nutritional standards in schools across the nation.In the 2009 a review from the Institute of Medicine recommended several updates to the National School lunch menus, the review found that the school cafeteria menus were not meeting the dietetic guidelines for school age children stated by the U.S Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Services (Healthy Hunger-Free Act, HHFA 2012)In 2011 the USDA proposed tonic regulations based on the finding of the Institute of Medicine of the United States. The process of modification of the school cafeteria me nus begin slowly but steady on schools across the nation, the changes include completely grain servings on all meals reduce saturated expoundten out sugar and sodium, and more fresh harvest-time and vegetables.Elizabeth Ippel, executive director of The honorary society of Global Citizenship in Chicago, talks about the important of nutritions good nutrition is essential and a very integral grammatical constituent to issueive learning. The changes are significant and according to Mrs. Ippel the students are responding confirmative to the modifications (Leamy, 2012)Heres an example of a before and after lunch menuBeforeAfterBreaded beef patty on a white wind up Baked Fish NuggetsFruit popsicleWhole wheat rollLow fat milkMashed potatoesBroccoliPeachesSkim MilkDiscussionOn December 13, 2010 president Obama signed into law 111-296 the Healthy Hunger Free Act of 2010. The act is one of the most comprehensive proposals in the school nutritional purlieu in over 15 years the main goa l of this law is to update school meals nutritional standards to help combat childhood obesity and help students achieve healthy eating habits. Beginning in July 2012 the new lunch meal pattern will be in effect changing what students will be consuming during lunch in the school year 2012-2013.The new proposed meal components includes key changes for children K and above, these changes requires that school lunches adjure a daily word form of whole grains, fruit and vegetables.In the fruit category, each meal provided by school cafeterias must include instill of fresh, frigid or canned fruits, prepared or compound with urine and not syrup. of vegetables on each meal is another requirement in the daily school lunch menus the new regulations required a variety of vegetable groups including dark green, red/orange, legumes, starchy and other vegetables.On the study of whole grains, breads and cereals are required on each meal as long as the food item includes more than 8 grams of grains. The act has also limit the amount of flavored milks opting for only low fat milk during meals. Calories are also under a scope view close the calorie ranges according to age groups. Trans-fat is banned completely from school cafeteria menus and the act has also a plan to limit sodium gradually over the next decade, to reach the goal of keeping sodium at a no more than 600 mg per meal, equal to a diet frozen meal (HHFKA, 2012).The changes in the cafeteria school menu are impacting students and teachers equally, besides of more nutritional value, the new menus now offered more quantity amounts of healthier foods, cheering the hunger of millions of students and reflecting healthier attitudes in the classrooms. LuAnn Coenen from Appleton Central High School in Wisconsin cheers the new regulations in the cafeteria menus and states Since the introductions of the new food program, I have sight and enormous difference in the behavior of my students in the classroom,I can say wit hout hesitation that its changed my job as principal.It seems that slight sugary foods and drinks are impacting students behavior. An associate professor of facts of life at the Lehigh university conducted a study of over 2000 lunchrooms across the nations, the conclusions indicated that healthier and slight sugary meals carries a calmer atmosphere in the classroom this calmer demeanor is reflects when students go back to the classrooms creating a trickling effect.Taylor a student from Appleton High commented about the changes she matte since the cafeteria menus changed Id say being able to concentrate soften. Susan Graham principal from Melrose Elementary in Tampa Florida confirms that her discipline referrals have rock-bottom 50 % We get a lot more done, I work out its a lot more efficient work environment for all of us, Grahams said (abcnews,2012).Berger (2005) wrote about the importance of a well balanced meal for the proper development of childrens brain development, and how school meal programs played an important rolled in childrens brain development, by providing a well balanced meal while in school children can achieve proper brain development a subsequently their ability to learn will be maximized (Berger, 2005).The changes happening in schools cafeterias power seem insignificant, but replacing extra-cheese pizza, deep fried chicken for whole wheat pizza and baked fish nuggets, represent a gigantic step towards making students healthy.Some modifications to the school lunch menu have happened slowly and some hidden from students, like replacing full fat cheese with a low fat mozzarella cheese in the pizzas, as well as using whole wheat bread on grill cheese sandwiches. Dr. Saira Jan a Rutgers University Professor (2006) comments on children obesity and diabetes uprise numbers Kids choose from what they are offered. They are hungry, they will eat. You can offer carrots or French fries. We have a big health-care problem. We cant just talk abou t it ( weekly Reader, 2006).ConclusionIn conclusion the boilersuit national concern over childhood obesity and the rising rate of diseases in children related to overweight issues is currently being addressed by different entities in charge of school nutrition. The National School lunch program has and will make modification on the students lunch menu to feed students healthier foods in the effort to fight childhood obesity. withal though there has been mixed opinions about the effectiveness of the lunch menu modifications, the HHFKA guidelines demonstrate howReferencesAbout USDA. (2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=ABOUT_USDABerger, Kathleen. (2005).The Developing Person Throughout the Lifespan. 6th ed.Worth. 140-142Child Nutritional Act.(2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1 010.pdf Food Fight Should School Lunches be healthier? Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication,17 Feb.(2006) Retrieved fromHealthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. (2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/legislation/cnr_2010.htmQuestions & Answers on the Final Rule, Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs(2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Governance/Policy-Memos/2012/SP10-2012osr2.pdfLazor, K., Chapman, N., & Levine, E. (2010).No.80. Vol.4. 200-206 Soy Goes to School adoption of Healthful, Vegetarian Options in Maryland Middle School Lunches. Journal Of School Health.Leamy, Elizabeth.(2011). sole(prenominal) USDA to Announce Healthier New School Lunch Guidelines. Retrieved from http//abcnews.go.com/Health/ConsumerNews/usda-announce-school-lunch-guidelines/story?id=1260 3193Mary Bruce. (2010). Coming Soon? Healthier School Lunches. Retrieved from http//abcnews.go.com/ administration/healthier-school-lunches-senate-approves-45-billion-bill/story?id=11345256Mcginn, D., & Popescu, R. (2007).No 150. Vol.17. Unlucky Charms At Lunch. Newsweek. Retrieved from http//mediacast.usw.edu8045/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA169875850&v=2.1&u=nm_a_elin&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=wNational School Lunch Program.(2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and NutritionService. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, No 17, Vol.77. (2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdfStudents behave better with healthy lunches. (2012). Abc. go. Retrieved fromhttp//abcnews.go.com/GMA/AmericanFamily/story?id=125404&page=1