nightingale s Environmental Theory versus Henderson s 14 constitutional NeedsIntroductionThe theories of nightingale and Henderson have some(prenominal) utilised the fields of environs and prefatorial inescapably in to explain the completes of health and wellness . The true theories , in their marrow concepts have evidently considered quaternity connect factors as keys in obtaining health (1 ) soundbox (2 ) meets (3 ) essential selection , and (4 ) balance . The surmisal of Nightingale has center in utilizing the surround in to provide the needs of the body in to facilitate its balance and eventually its endurance . With the similar abstractive principle Henderson has also proposed her opening on 14 primaeval needs in to direct the process of achieving health by dint of the utilization of surroundingsal compo nents to facilitate the balance of bodily physiology which wherefore leads to its natural selection . that , one of the theories possesses largely broad result concepts that implicate change theoretical implicationsNightingale s Environmental TheoryAs far as the theoretical principle is concerned , Nightingale s environsal surmisal (1869 ) emphasizes the use of five environsal components in achieving health , viz. (1 ) clarified and fresh air (2 ) pure water (3 ) expeditious drainage (4 ) cleanliness , and (5 ) appropriate lighting (McEwen and Wills , 2006.133 . These surroundal components preciseally sabotage the importance of these vestigial needs in directing the body towards a health state . The theory of Nightingale broadly speaking defines the utilization of environment in attaining balance and health , and facilitating survival . In fact , the essence concepts of Nightingale raise choke the contributions of environment to these five componentsHenderson s 14 Fundamental NeedsMeanwhile , the theory of V! irginia Henderson s 14 Fundamental Needs (1966 ) has grow its core components to variety of possible environmental influences . Aside from the latent physiological influences of environment to health (e .g .

breathing , eating and imbibing , etc Henderson has further expanded her core concepts exploring both external ( fleshly surrounding environment ) and internal environments (body which further specify the affinity between body and the utilization of environment directed towards health (Craven and Hirnle , 2005.63 Henderson s fundamental needs have focused on both material (e .g breathing normally ) and accessible ( e .g . participation in unhomogeneous forms of recreation ) environmental components , and utilized these core concepts to explain the relationship between health and environmentComparisonThe two core concepts of Nightingale and Henderson both utilize the principles of using environment to establish balance in body directed to its survival , which overall defines the classical feeling on health However , the core concept in Nightingale s environment has been establish solely on environment through her five components . The components of environment can further secernate out to diversified compositions (e .g physical and non-physical environment . Meanwhile , in the theory of Henderson , the 14 Fundamental Needs are derived from specific relationships existing between environment and body directed in achieving health . Unlike Nightingale , Henderson has incorporated both physical and non-physical or social environment and further links these components to fall apart explain the subject of the theory , which is the ideal basic need! s of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment